![codemasters f1 2018 demo codemasters f1 2018 demo](http://up.picr.de/31083260ap.jpg)
It’s this pairing that I think really highlights the lack of championship rivals through the classic car roster. Outside of that, it’s classic Lotus cars and Ferraris, with Niki Lauda’s 1976 Ferrari 312 T2 joined by James Hunt’s McLaren M23D. The main exceptions to that are the 2009 Brawn GP-001, which was recreated off the back of visiting Ross Brawn’s garage, and the 2003 Williams that Juan Pablo Montoya won a couple of races in. None of that will matter if you step into one of the classic cars, with the new additions predominantly taking players back to the 1970s.
![codemasters f1 2018 demo codemasters f1 2018 demo](https://videos.winfuture.de/19462.jpg)
Do you spend more points on this year’s car or potentially sacrifice the championship to get an advantage next year? Sadly it won’t manifest itself in physical changes to the cars – it’d be lovely to be able to start with 2015’s cars and shift through the years, I think – but you’ll be warned when the rules are changing and all the possible work you might lose, then deciding how many of resource points you’re going to spend to try and preserve your current performance. These are based around the real world needs of each, but there’s also now an element of guesswork as you’ll not be able to see the entire tree and could find yourself down a development dead end.įor the die hard fans that will sink dozens of hours into running through several seasons in the career, there’s now the distinct possibility of facing a rule change. Upgrades will be easier and quicker to unlock, but you now have to contend with different tech trees for each team. For one thing, you can now simulate practice sessions to still get some of the R&D points kickback but without the monotonous drudge that could seep in after a while, and you’re also rewarded for you performance in races. With 2018, they’ve tweaked and reconsidered much of this progression. Since F1 2015, they’ve built some really solid foundations for their game and the career each iteration contains, first with 2016’s practice sessions feeding car upgrades with more engaging tasks, and then with how last year added a more engaging R&D tech tree and the classic car events. It’s interesting to see something like this returning to F1 games, and it does feel like it’s time for Codemasters to be doing so, expanding the game’s focus away from just what happens on track. Blaming the aero design for poor performance might knock the team morale and lower the rate and efficacy of upgrades coming to the track, or it could spur them on if you call upon them to redouble their efforts in a more magnanimous fashion. Some teams might be looking for that strong, self-aggrandising attitude when looking for a driver, while others will want the team player, and this determines your standing with each team in the paddock as well as what perks you might be able to get on your contract. Your answers can heap praise on yourself, share it with your team, blame others, and so on, but these will no have deeper links into your career progression. There’s a hint of Telltale in how you’re given a handful of different answers to her questions, whether it’s something innocuous like how you’re feeling ahead of your first race weekend, quizzing you on a lack of performance, a mistake, or celebrating your success.